Thursday, September 24, 2009

High School Graduation Requirements

Career and Technical Education (CTE), in my opinion, has a dual purpose. The first purpose is to provide career exploration. We all know that children grow up with desires for a certain career such as fire fighter, law enforcement, professional athlete, and such. We also know that those aspirations change regularly. Many students in middle school through about tenth grade are unsure of their career aspirations. Even those that think they know often change their minds several times by the time they finish college or trade school. CTE give them the opportunity to learn skills necessary for almost every career choice. Many students who try various CTE courses are better able to match their interests with their abilities through career exploration.

The second purpose of CTE is to provide specific skills to better prepare them for entering the world of work, whether it is right out of high school, a technical or trade school, or a four-year college and beyond. I believe that most CTE programs do an exemplary job of providing skills to students to help them succeed.

The frustration for most CTE instructors, however, comes from the traditional ideal that every student needs to go to college. Statistics show that is not true for all careers in today's world. However, CTE is constantly fighting for adequate funding. In addition, there is constant pressure that any college-bound student has to take all the high level math and science classes. Recently, legislation has increased the graduation requirements for additional math and science classes. Students are being told that they need to take Chemistry, Physics, and Calculus to be successful in college. The fact is that many degree programs and career choices have absolutely no need for these skills. Students are being discouraged from taking CTE classes because they are "college-bound". Often the good students are unable to do career exploration because they cannot find time in their class schedules to take CTE classes. We need to help the students find what career they can most enjoy and be successful at, and then have them take classes that will prepare them for their chosen career.

It was my understanding that one of the driving forces behind highly qualified teachers was to get the most qualified teachers teaching the subjects they are experts in. The Business Education Department for many years taught Business Math. Students earned math credit for graduation by taking this class. This class was designed to provide basic math skills for students who struggled with Algebra and Geometry. They were taught to compute interest, calculate loan repayment, balance checkbooks, and the like. In other words, life skills in math. Most of the students were not college-bound. We had to quit offering the class for math credit because we were not highly qualified in math. When the Math Department took the class over, it quickly became another Pre-Algebra class. The needs of our low-achieving students were forgotten. Now, we are required to teach certain defined personal finance skills. The skills defined by the legislature were among the skills taught in our Business Math. Who is better qualified to teach personal finance than a business teacher? So who is going to teach personal finance? The Social Studies Department. Once again, CTE gets slighted because we are not a core area.

4 comments:

  1. CTE is a forgotten and misunderstood subject. Every class in CTE combines everything students learn in regular academics and applies them to a career or defines the purpose of having different academic skills. Despite this great thing, it is ignored because many educators think it is unimportant. Last time I checked, more individuals were going into careers closely associated with CTE departments than Math, Science, or Literature jobs. Those subjects are needed to have good job skills and be a successful employee. The attitude of education needs to change from simply giving students lessons to preparing them for a job, a career, and a life. We cannot expect students to be prepared to enter the workforce and be competitive without giving them skills used in CTE.

    ReplyDelete
  2. When I first read your post I substituted dull for dual and I was getting upset. I couldn't beleive someone could think that these classes are not important. I did go back and realize that I had made an error. I totally agree that these classes are important. Critical! We need to decide if our focus is to prepare students for college, the work force, or trade school. We can not just have a one size fits all education because someone will suffer. Check out Marc Prensky's view of these things. He thinks that we should have a form of trade school for high schools. We cannot loose these classes.
    Philip Russel

    ReplyDelete
  3. Randy--
    Along with stressing the importance of these courses (and indeed, they are!)you brought up another very valid (and sometimes forgot about) point. As we increase the number of required courses without changing the time table, kids simply cannot take the variety of courses that they would otherwise be able to. And high school is a great time to try some of these things prior to committing money and time in a college setting.

    As a science teacher, I also am curious to see how that will play out in a chemistry or physics classroom. Most of those students are there because they are either interested in science after high school (especially the ones taking many science classes)or consider themselves college-bound. To add students not interested in either really changes the dynamics of those very courses--will they have separate sections then for kids taking it simply "because they need the credit"?

    Thanks for the good points, Randy!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I feel that the term “College Bound” is code for “passing the buck.” My school district is full of these so-called college bound students. My school does not try to help kids find a path that fits. All kids are encouraged to take high level classes and hit the books so to speak. The principal has killed any technology classes that they once had. Its as though the school is not intended to help kids find a direction in life. They expect the college experience to do this for them. So I guess the bigger question is when and how should kids find the path that’s right for them?

    ReplyDelete